WorldCat Identities

Ivanchenko, Roman Hryhoriĭovych

Overview
Works: 7 works in 14 publications in 2 languages and 93 library holdings
Genres: History  Biography  Dictionaries  Criticism, interpretation, etc  Sources 
Roles: Author
Publication Timeline
.
Most widely held works by Roman Hryhoriĭovych Ivanchenko
Ivan Nechuĭ-Levyt︠s︡ʹkyĭ : narys z︠h︡ytti︠a︡ i tvorchosti by Roman Hryhoriĭovych Ivanchenko( Book )

4 editions published in 1980 in Ukrainian and held by 33 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Litopys hadi︠a︡t︠s︡ʹkoho polkovnyka Hryhorii︠a︡ Hrabi︠a︡nky by Hryhoriĭ Ivanovych Hrabi︠a︡nka( Book )

2 editions published in 1992 in Ukrainian and held by 32 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Reklama--slovnyk terminiv by Roman Hryhoriĭovych Ivanchenko( Book )

2 editions published in 1998 in Ukrainian and held by 8 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Shli︠a︡khom "Pravdy" : Zbirnyk prysvi︠a︡chenyĭ 60-ĭ richnytsi "Pravdy"( Book )

1 edition published in 1972 in Ukrainian and held by 6 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Pryvydy Lavrsʹkykh pecher by Roman Hryhoriĭovych Ivanchenko( Book )

1 edition published in 1964 in Ukrainian and held by 5 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Literaturne redahuvanni︠a︡ by Roman Hryhoriĭovych Ivanchenko( Book )

2 editions published between 1970 and 1983 in Ukrainian and held by 5 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Interactions between Congress and the Supreme Court by Roman Hryhoriĭovych Ivanchenko( )

2 editions published in 2007 in English and held by 4 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Abstract: The scholarship on the interactions between Congress and Supreme Court typically incorporates two assumptions: Congress has the final word so that legislative actions constrain the Court and both congressional and judicial actions are motivated almost solely by ideological considerations. However, by enacting statutes, Congress acts first, and the Court responds to challenges to those statutes in cases brought by dissatisfied litigants. Further, the Supreme Court typically has the last word in constitutional cases. Second, both members of Congress and Supreme Court Justices benefit from achieving policy that is successful and consistent with their ideological preferences. This dissertation develops a framework that incorporates these departures. The theory argues that Congress is the constrained branch in constitutional interactions. It conceptualizes each statute as consisting of two components: its ideological content and its suitability--its effectiveness in achieving the goals that underlie it. Having the power to make law, Congress has to anticipate whether the Court would invalidate a prospective statute. If necessary, Congress will temper the ideological content of its legislation, or it will attempt to increase the suitability of the statute. The Supreme Court can accept trade-offs of increased suitability for lower ideological benefits. I conduct four empirical analyses. First, I test whether ideology and a statute's suitability influence judicial decisions to uphold or invalidate statutes. The second analysis reexamines these decisions in conjunction with the Court's decisions to review challenges to federal laws. The third analysis examines the impact of ideology and suitability on the fate of federal statutes over time. The final analysis focuses on statutes to determine whether and how the threat of judicial invalidation influences the suitability component of statutes. The findings support the theoretical model proposed in this dissertation. The empirical analyses agree with the existing research that ideology plays an important role in judicial decision making. However, the suitability component of a federal statute also influences the probability of judicial invalidation and whether the Court grants a writ of certiorari. Additionally, the findings suggest that when Congress makes law, its efforts to ensure the suitability of federal statutes are affected by Supreme Court preferences
 
Audience Level
0
Audience Level
1
  Kids General Special  
Audience level: 0.77 (from 0.60 for Interactio ... to 0.81 for Reklama--s ...)

Alternative Names
Ivanchenko, R. H. (Roman Hryhoriĭovych)

Ivanchenko, R. (Roman)

Ivanchenko, Roman Grigorʹevich

Languages