WorldCat Identities

Corker, Charles E.

Overview
Works: 36 works in 86 publications in 1 language and 1,239 library holdings
Genres: Bibliography  Trials, litigation, etc  Conference papers and proceedings  Bibliography of bibliographies  Rules  Bibliographies 
Roles: Author, Editor
Classifications: Z7164.S67, 335.4
Publication Timeline
.
Most widely held works by Charles E Corker
Digest of the public record of communism in the United States( Book )

8 editions published between 1955 and 1977 in English and held by 425 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Bibliography on the Communist problem in the United States( Book )

6 editions published between 1955 and 1971 in English and held by 419 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Introduction to commercial law by Robert Braucher( Book )

6 editions published between 1949 and 1950 in English and held by 131 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Ground water law, management, and administration by Charles E Corker( Book )

16 editions published in 1971 in English and held by 115 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

State of Arizona v. State of California, et al. : interstate cases in the original jurisdiction concerning interstate waters( Book )

2 editions published in 1959 in English and held by 35 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Interstate cases in the original jurisdiction concerning interstate waters by Arizona( Book )

3 editions published in 1959 in English and held by 20 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : memorandum of the California defendants in clarification of interrogatories to the United States : and resubmitted interrogatories by Arizona( Book )

11 editions published in 1956 in English and held by 17 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."--Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author)
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master : brief of the California defendants to accompany their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law : in two volumes : volume one by Arizona( Book )

4 editions published in 1959 in English and held by 4 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."--Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author)
The Colorado River controversy: Arizona v. California by Charles E Corker( Book )

2 editions published in 1955 in English and held by 4 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

The issues in Arizona v. California by Charles E Corker( Book )

2 editions published in 1959 in English and held by 3 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Jordan by Charles E Corker( Book )

1 edition published in 2011 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Construction of symmetrical, harmonious and attractive edifices with legal bricks--the do-it-yourself manual by Charles E Corker( Book )

1 edition published in 1958 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Water rights and federalism : the western water rights settlement bill of 1957 by Charles E Corker( Book )

1 edition published in 1957 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : memorandum on the admissibility of evidence probative in proving the meaning of the phrases "beneficial consumptive use" and "consumptive use" by California( Book )

1 edition published in 1956 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."--Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author)
Comparative studies on aliens' constitutional rights between the United States and Japan by Moriyasu Michino( Book )

1 edition published in 1973 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : memorandum on admissibility in evidence of a letter from the acting secretary of interior and enclosed regulations to Messrs. Stewart & Shaw, counsel for defendant, Palo Verde Irrigation District, dated July 31, 1930 : submitted by the California defendants by Arizona( Book )

1 edition published in 1956 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."--Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author)
The development of the enrolled bill doctrine in Washington by Robert C Alexander( Book )

1 edition published in 1973 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Supplement for Law A525, Water law, Summer quarter, 1984 by Charles E Corker( Book )

1 edition published in 1984 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

 
moreShow More Titles
fewerShow Fewer Titles
Audience Level
0
Audience Level
1
  Kids General Special  
Audience level: 0.55 (from 0.43 for The law of ... to 0.87 for Constructi ...)

Languages
English (70)