WorldCat Identities

Matton, Nadine

Overview
Works: 6 works in 6 publications in 2 languages and 10 library holdings
Roles: Other, Thesis advisor, Opponent
Publication Timeline
.
Most widely held works by Nadine Matton
Visualizing complexities: the human limits of air traffic control by Nicolas Durand( )

1 edition published in 2018 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Cognitive Load Theory and Time Considerations: Using the Time-Based Resource Sharing Model by Sébastien Puma( )

1 edition published in 2018 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Author Correction: Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS by Mickaël Causse( )

1 edition published in 2018 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS by Mickaël Causse( )

1 edition published in 2017 in English and held by 2 WorldCat member libraries worldwide

La priorisation humaine. Étude des corrélats cognitifs de l'évaluation des priorités by Benoît Valéry( )

1 edition published in 2017 in French and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

La viabilité des systèmes de travail complexes repose en partie sur la capacité des opérateurs à y gérer des tâches concurrentes en fonction de leurs priorités respectives. Il s'agit là d'un processus critique qui, lorsqu'il est défaillant, peut amener à des erreurs de négligence ou de persévération sur certaines opérations. Les modèles actuels de la priorisation humaine présentent de nombreuses limites : ils sont souvent normatifs et ne rendent pas suffisamment compte de la façon dont les opérateurs utilisent effectivement l'information disponible dans l'environnement pour le calcul des priorités. Leur faible pouvoir descriptif ne permet pas réellement de comprendre les mécanismes cognitifs contributifs de l'erreur, spécialement dans des situations de surcharge mentale. Cette thèse, en adoptant l'approche de l'ergonomie cognitive, se donne pour objectif de mieux comprendre et décrire ces processus. Trois expérimentations fondamentales ont été menées, qui toutes mettaient les participants aux prises avec des situations de double-tâche, où divers attributs (difficulté, importance, marge d'erreur) des tâches étaient manipulés. Ces tâches reproduisaient des sollicitations des environnements complexes, comme la mémorisation, la surveillance, ou encore le diagnostic sous incertitude. L'ensemble des résultats souligne l'importance de la priorisation dans la bonne tenue des systèmes complexes, et suggère une sensibilisation accrue des opérateurs à ces phénomènes lors de leur formation, ainsi qu'une réflexion à plus long terme sur la présentation de l'information dans le contexte des interfaces homme-machine
Optimisation des apprentissages : modèles et mesures de la charge cognitive by Sébastien Puma( )

1 edition published in 2016 in French and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide

Learning allows you to gain the necessary knowledge to adapt to the world. Cognitive load theory takes into consideration cognitive resources invested during school learning. However, two main limitations can be identified: a theoretical one and a methodological one. From a theoretical perspective, CLT invoke working memory (WM) to describe the cognitive resources used during learning and these models do not take time into account. The other limit is related to methodology: CLT doesn't offer measures of cognitive load either reliable or dynamic.Taking into consideration these limitations, we suggest the use of physiological measurement and a new WM model: the TBRS (Time Based Resource Sharing). Physiological measurement is a mean to analyze the temporal variations implied by the cognitive load while TBRS model takes the temporal variation of the attentional focus allocation into account. However, the TBRS has not yet been used with meaningful items, which could be gathered into chunks. Thus, the aim of the present work is to study the benefits of using physiological measurement and the TBRS model with CLT.To address the question of cognitive load measurement, a first experiment used a task included in the ENAC's (École Nationale d'Aviation Civile) recruitment selection process. During the experiment, cerebral activity (EEG) and eye movements (Eye-tracking) were recorded. Another series of four experiments stressed the question of the use of the TBRS model in CLT. They began by replicating a previous study using the TBRS model (exp. 2 & 3), replacing items to be held in memory by items which could be chunked. The other two experiments extended these results. Finally a sixth experiment used physiological measures to assess cognitive load variations while participants performed a protocol similar to the previous experiments.Results from these six experiments show that TBRS model and physiological measurement are consistent with CLT and also complete its findings
 
Audience Level
0
Audience Level
1
  General Special  
Audience level: 0.97 (from 0.95 for Optimisati ... to 0.97 for Author Cor ...)

Alternative Names
Ambrosini Matton, Nadine

Matton, Nadine

Nadine Matton onderzoeker

Languages